Здравейте и от нас, Стела и Димитър!
Първо искаме да ви поздравим за създаването на новия форум, надяваме се да бъде полезен за всички прохождащи кивианци
Преди няколко дни получихме оценката от имиг. консултант, който малко ни попари, оказва се че и ние май сме си напляскали точки, които според имиграционното право няма да вземем. След няколко дневна кореспонденция нещата започнаха да се изясняват. Имам обаче лошото усещане, че не всичко което пише в сайта на www.immigration.govt.nz го тълкуваме правилно.
Накратко казано изпраща ни да си търсим работа в Нова Зеландия.
Dimitar Dimitrov (recommended principal applicant)*
- Age: 25 points
- Qualification: 50 (NOT automatically recognised)
- Work experience: 30 (> 10 years IT full-time )
- Partner's qualification: 0 points
Total I: 105
Bonus points:
- Offer of Employment: 50 points
- Job outside Auckland: 10 points
- Qualification in Future Growth Area (IT): 10
- Work Experience in Future Growth Area (IT): 10
- Offer of employment in Future Growth Area IT: 10
Total II: 90
Please note that bonus points in Areas of Future Growth (AFG)
are subject to an offer of skilled employment in the AFG
Total points: 195
Ние от своя страна пресмятахме точките по следния начин:
> explain why I think I can claim all these points.
Age: 25
> Qualifications: 60 ( or 50 - Subject of NZQA assessment) Work
> Experience: 30 ( >10 years IT full time ) Bonus for Qualification
> in an area of absolute skills shortage: 10 Bonus for Work experience
> in an area of absolute skills shortage: 15 (> 6years)
> --------------------- Total: 140
(or 130 if NZQA assessment states
> level(7))
В отговор на което имиг. консултант ни отговори:
### sorry, it is not that simple.
You need to provide a full NZQA assessment report that specifically states that your qualification is directly comparable to the requirement listed in column 4 of the LTSSL.
We have lodged thousands of NZQA assessments and since introduction of the current Qualification Framework, European qualifications are usually assessed as comparable to 'A qualification @ Level 7/8/9'
The NZQA does not state the additional information listed in column 4 (......specialising in Information Technology (Computer Science, Information Systems or other Information
> Technology) OR Bachelor degree (Level 7) ........)
The latter is required for the award of bonus points.
From our experience only UK/Commonwealth qualifications and Bachelor's/Masters issued after the Bologna declaration have a chance to get assessed as required.
Again, the report needs to state the full requirements listed in column 4 or you won't get bonus points.
A recent example from a UK client:
Completed Bachelor's of Hons in Computer Science from a University listed in Appendix 3
As the client claimed bonus points in AASS , the officer (rightly so) requested an NZQA report which stated the following:
Bachelor degree Hons (Level 8) specialising in Computer Science, 360 credits
The client did NOT get bonuspoints as the column 4 requires a qualification @ level 7 (he completed a Level 8).
The same applies to work experience in AASS, bonus points can only be awarded if you meet all requirement of column 4 of the LTSSL.
> The key for success of the approach I suggest is the NZQA assessment.
### correct, this will give you confirmation whether you are eligible for bonus points in AASS or not (we predict you won't, and I expect you to need an offer of employment).
> In addition I may start looking for a job offer at the same time and
> if I find one (which is not likely to happen IMO) I would be able to
> score also the 90 bonus points you mention.
### this is pointless, nobody will even talk to you unless you are in NZ and ready lodge a work visa application with almost immediate start (usually around 3 weeks).
От тези написани неща, разбираме че е трудно да се вземат точки за work experience и бонус точки за work experience и квалификация.
А иначе вижте от какво предполага че произлиза нашето погрешно пресмятане на точки консултанта
I note that the number of Bulgarian inquiries suggesting a similar pathway goes up by the day and I have the feeling that this is caused by some 'experts' in a forum who clearly haven't got a clue what they are talking about.
Първо искаме да ви поздравим за създаването на новия форум, надяваме се да бъде полезен за всички прохождащи кивианци Преди няколко дни получихме оценката от имиг. консултант, който малко ни попари, оказва се че и ние май сме си напляскали точки, които според имиграционното право няма да вземем. След няколко дневна кореспонденция нещата започнаха да се изясняват. Имам обаче лошото усещане, че не всичко което пише в сайта на www.immigration.govt.nz го тълкуваме правилно.
Накратко казано изпраща ни да си търсим работа в Нова Зеландия.
Dimitar Dimitrov (recommended principal applicant)*
- Age: 25 points
- Qualification: 50 (NOT automatically recognised)
- Work experience: 30 (> 10 years IT full-time )
- Partner's qualification: 0 points
Total I: 105
Bonus points:
- Offer of Employment: 50 points
- Job outside Auckland: 10 points
- Qualification in Future Growth Area (IT): 10
- Work Experience in Future Growth Area (IT): 10
- Offer of employment in Future Growth Area IT: 10
Total II: 90
Please note that bonus points in Areas of Future Growth (AFG)
are subject to an offer of skilled employment in the AFG
Total points: 195
Ние от своя страна пресмятахме точките по следния начин:
> explain why I think I can claim all these points.
Age: 25
> Qualifications: 60 ( or 50 - Subject of NZQA assessment) Work
> Experience: 30 ( >10 years IT full time ) Bonus for Qualification
> in an area of absolute skills shortage: 10 Bonus for Work experience
> in an area of absolute skills shortage: 15 (> 6years)
> --------------------- Total: 140
(or 130 if NZQA assessment states
> level(7))
В отговор на което имиг. консултант ни отговори:
### sorry, it is not that simple.
You need to provide a full NZQA assessment report that specifically states that your qualification is directly comparable to the requirement listed in column 4 of the LTSSL.
We have lodged thousands of NZQA assessments and since introduction of the current Qualification Framework, European qualifications are usually assessed as comparable to 'A qualification @ Level 7/8/9'
The NZQA does not state the additional information listed in column 4 (......specialising in Information Technology (Computer Science, Information Systems or other Information
> Technology) OR Bachelor degree (Level 7) ........)
The latter is required for the award of bonus points.
From our experience only UK/Commonwealth qualifications and Bachelor's/Masters issued after the Bologna declaration have a chance to get assessed as required.
Again, the report needs to state the full requirements listed in column 4 or you won't get bonus points.
A recent example from a UK client:
Completed Bachelor's of Hons in Computer Science from a University listed in Appendix 3
As the client claimed bonus points in AASS , the officer (rightly so) requested an NZQA report which stated the following:
Bachelor degree Hons (Level 8) specialising in Computer Science, 360 credits
The client did NOT get bonuspoints as the column 4 requires a qualification @ level 7 (he completed a Level 8).
The same applies to work experience in AASS, bonus points can only be awarded if you meet all requirement of column 4 of the LTSSL.
> The key for success of the approach I suggest is the NZQA assessment.
### correct, this will give you confirmation whether you are eligible for bonus points in AASS or not (we predict you won't, and I expect you to need an offer of employment).
> In addition I may start looking for a job offer at the same time and
> if I find one (which is not likely to happen IMO) I would be able to
> score also the 90 bonus points you mention.
### this is pointless, nobody will even talk to you unless you are in NZ and ready lodge a work visa application with almost immediate start (usually around 3 weeks).
От тези написани неща, разбираме че е трудно да се вземат точки за work experience и бонус точки за work experience и квалификация.
А иначе вижте от какво предполага че произлиза нашето погрешно пресмятане на точки консултанта
I note that the number of Bulgarian inquiries suggesting a similar pathway goes up by the day and I have the feeling that this is caused by some 'experts' in a forum who clearly haven't got a clue what they are talking about.
Comment